How is your mRNA tainted meat, dear?
Updated Feb. 2nd 2025
I try not to be opinionated concerning health and wellness. To present the evidence in a non biased manner. And I'll admit I can do better. But it is really hard when external forces have agendas to squash, denigrate or hide evidence. And this becomes personal when authoritative figures intentionally lie and mislead, potentially affecting my health and welfare.
When you hear things like "safe and effective" for a product (mRNA vaccine) they knew, well in advance, was toxic,... or that they give newborns at birth, a vaccine (Hep B) they absolutely have no need for, it makes you want to scream. And this latter example has been going on since 1991. BTW, Hep B spreads mainly through sexual contact or sharing needles. This way, toddlers needn't worry in having unprotected sex or sharing some dope. I joke to show you how ridiculous and unnecessary this is. The Hep B vaccine like many vaccines, contains the heavy metal aluminum. I guess the thinking here is that,… since everybody is exposed to this toxic heavy metal, why not give it to newborns? I think if we were aware of what they were doing, all this time, we would have thought long and hard about getting their toxic clot shots. If there was one benefit to this pandemic, it was that it opened our eyes to the dangers of all vaccines, not just mRNA. Prior to the pandemic, I hadn’t a clue.
I was fortunate in that I was retired, and so couldn't be mandated to keep employment. But I was in that high risk category, so I did inquire about it. And after reading their consent/waiver form, with it stating some exceptions about autoimmunity and cancer, I declined on taking it. I am a cancer survivor with an autoimmune condition. So, I was lucky I wasn't vaxxed. And really, who knew of the dangers of vaccines beforehand? That said, I was certainly aware that this was a novel product, never before used, with no long term safety data. So I did approach cautiously, but even so, I would be vaxxed today, if there weren't those exceptions on the waiver. So even with the knowledge that this was a new technology, with no safety data to speak of, I almost still got vaxxed. Fear is a powerful emotion that cuts down critical thinking. And I don't see how anyone didn't fear COVID early in the pandemic.
I think next time, we will be much better prepared to weigh the risk/benefit ratio of any intervention with what we experienced the past 3 or 4 years. They will continue with their fear tactics with disease X, measles or whatever. Let's learn from recent events and not fall prey to their scare mongering ever again. It's bad enough this weaponized virus continues to circulate. And then having to deal with the government's complicity with drug cartels, in their continued persistence to promote toxic products on the public.
A paper came out in Sept. 2023 that showed,... those who got two shots of the mRNA vaccines, had their hearts working twice as hard as the unvaxxed. And this lasted for up to 6 months after their last injection. We are not talking about myocarditis here. This is everybody who got the shots, having this increased workload. They found an astounding 47% increased effort, going on in cardiac cells of the vaccinated, compared to the unvaccinated. And looking at this paper, it looks like a well designed study. It excluded many that had pre-existing diseases or conditions or other issues,... including myocarditis or a previous COVID infection. Its P-value was .001. That's a 1,000 to 1 odds this result came by chance….
This Canadian doctor explains the results of this study and the ramifications better than I can….
It kind of explains a lot, with people dying suddenly for no apparent reason. Whether on the playing field, in the cockpit, on stage or in their sleep.
And those unvaccinated, should not think, they have dodged a bullet. This toxic product will soon be found in our food. It is already happening in Canada. There is an approved mRNA vaccine currently available in Canada for swine.
‘The use of mRNA vaccines in the livestock that we eat is limited, but Shayan Sharif, a professor at the University of Guelph's Ontario Veterinary College said that could change in the future….” We need to talk about mRNA vaccines in the meats we eat, says Guelph veterinary professor | CBC News (July 2023)
Here is a rancher in the US, just yesterday, April 3rd 2024, shouting his concerns. He states they found remnants of the vaccine in the meat of those hogs that died from the shot, in a study with 525 hogs. I don’t know where he is getting this information from, but it is very concerning and needs to be investigated.
American Rancher Blows Whistle On ‘Horrifying’ mRNA Vaccine Results in Livestock - thaimbc (April 3rd 2024)
Amazingly, this article comes from Thailand. This US rancher posted this incredible news on Twitter and not one US or UK or any western media news outlet has picked up this story. I wish he posted a link to the study. Maybe he will soon. He only announced this yesterday.
Edit Update (Feb. 2nd 2025): As usual, they have broken the last link I supplied to that news article in Thailand. Here is the original clip of the US rancher on Twitter, also on Bitchute and Rumble…
American Rancher Blowing The Whistle On mRNA Vaccine Tests In Livestock - Twitter
American Rancher Blowing The Whistle On mRNA Vaccine Tests In Livestock - Bitchute
American Rancher Blowing The Whistle On mRNA Vaccine Tests In Livestock - Rumble
I’m getting a little tired of fixing broken links, with them trying to suppress information. This is occurring in every post of mine. One of these new links above should work for you. I think from now on, Feb. 2025, I will post only sources from studies in the scientific literature. They don’t dare touch those, but sometimes news articles are very relevant.
This US rancher also sat down for an interview later on, and discussed it a bit further…
I’m still looking for the study this rancher says was done by the USDA.
Dr. R.M. Thornsberry, D.V.M. and chairman of R-CALF USA’s animal health committee, has expressed his concern about mRNA vaccines in livestock. Thornsberry pointed out that the United States has not approved mRNA injections in cattle, but they are in use on a limited basis in swine. He said the dilemma for beef is that the U.S. is importing more and more beef from many different countries, some of which either already are, or plan to begin using mRNA in cattle… “This points to the urgent need for MCOOL (mandatory country of origin labeling),” he said adding, “Consumers deserve the right to choose whether to consume beef from a country where mRNA injections are being given to cattle, and the only way they can have that choice is if Congress passes MCOOL for beef.” Messenger RNA Vaccines in Meat Animals – How are mRNA vaccines different and are they safe? | TSLN.com
Even though that quote above is from 2023,.. this article from Feb. 2024 says basically the same thing… NASDA conference addresses mRNA vaccines
I can’t find anything more recent. And you know when they do allow these GMO clot shots in cattle, here in the States, it won’t be front page news, that’s for sure. It’s only a matter time, the way these articles spell it out.
Looks like pork is no longer on my menu. And now, even beef and dairy is questionable based on origin. This is heartbreaking. I love my Jarlsberg cheese. And if anyone says, the harmful GMO spike won’t be in the dairy or meat products sold to the public,… they are lying. We know the mRNA vaccine’s toxic spike is found everywhere in the body,.. including in bone. So it is laughable they won’t be found in the meat or dairy products.
“We investigated the presence of spike protein in the skulls of 34 patients who died from non-COVID-related causes during the pandemic in 2021 and 2022. We indeed identified the spike protein in 10 of them.” SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull | bioRxiv
So even us unvaccinated are not completely out of the woods altogether.
Stay safe and be well…..
I will come back to what I said in another presentation of yours, but on which you had your reservations. m-RNA could be a big promise of future, but it looks very very unsafe in its present state now for public use - whether directly to humans or via pigs. Research can go on for making it safe, but the scientific community must agree to stop its public use in any manner for at least the next 20 years. But how ? Is it even possible ? Get the three Nobel winners last year to issue a statement that the technology should not find a public use, unless all its loose ends are tied and it becomes absolutely safe. The prize itself was for just one aspect of safety, there could be another 99 unsafe corners lurking around in the technology. It is all about safety, not the performance or efficacy of an application, like the claims on the Covid m-RNA vaccines. Their statement must be very strong, even keeping their Prize on the block. We have reasonably restrained possibly runaway technologies like nuclear chemistry or direct genetics. We already have trouble with AI, where at least its beneficial and malafide roles are well known. m-RNA has more severe tests to pass.
ohbaby- What a great Substack post. This is something that EVERYONE can understand. It is simple and short and impactful. I plan on sharing this with the Doubters in my life to give them something chew on. (Pun intended.) Thank you!