Where Is The Outrage With Us Being Treated Like Guinea Pigs?

Updated Jan. 10th 2024

It's been a few weeks since learning Pfizer never tested the vaccine that went into the arms of billions. Not before the rollout or even during its distribution. They never tested its safety on animals either….

Blockbuster Revelation - The Jabs You Received Were Never Tested - ohbaby's substack

You would think this would cause some sort of uproar. To demand some kind of explanation,… or at least initiate some kind of inquiry. But we hear nothing but crickets. The silence is deafening. There is not a word from any politician from any government on this bombshell revelation. Not a peep of a news report either. And to make matters worse, they just awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine to the researchers behind mRNA technology used in the COVID vaccines.

I have said this before, but I think bears repeating here,... Whoever came up with the idea of having the human body produce and manufacture foreign antigens,… should be shot after hanging from the tallest branch, and then burned at the stake…

These are the idiots who believe it's a good thing for our body to create foreign proteins. Your body creating foreign antigens, which by definition are toxins and the reason why your body attacks them (invoking an immune response),.. couldn't possibly have any benefits that would outweigh the enormous, obvious risks involved. Their idea to instruct the human body to produce, basically a poison, is just warped beyond comprehension. This is on top of the fact, the package that carries the genetic code (LNP’s) is also cytotoxic. The Nobel Prize just became as prestigious,... as winning employee of the month at Big Bob's Bait and Tackle shop.

The mRNA platform has always been and always will be,… a failed technology. I don't see how anyone could possibly think otherwise. And now we see the staggering amount of statistical evidence, showing how absolutely horrific these untested, experimental, GMO, mRNA vaccines truly are....

CDC’s VAERS Vaccine Adverse Events reported by year....

Zoomed in….

Western Australia’s Adverse Events reported….

VigiAccess from the World Health Organization (WHO) Database….

VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Events breakdown....

CDC’s V-Safe monitoring system data compiled in this interactive chart….

Please keep in mind, that they changed many of the processes in order to scale up production of these clot shots. Essentially making this an entirely new product than the one they studied. That they then rolled out to the public untested, making any promises of safety and efficacy invalid.

The full scale production also introduced more quality and safety concerns. In fact, leaked documents have revealed significant decreases in RNA integrity, in commercial batches of the Pfizer vaccine.

“Leaked emails from the European Medicine Agency, assessment reports and Pfizer-related documents revealed an alarming drop in the RNA integrity of the Pfizer vaccine in commercial vaccine batches (around 55%) compared to clinical trial batches (around 78%). This was known by key regulators, including the MHRA, just a few weeks before emergency use authorization was granted on 1st December 2020. The EMA classified this drop in quality as a ‘product related impurity,’ and the solution was to lower the acceptance criteria of the commercial batches rolled out to the general public to 50%. Vaccine manufacturers have been allowed to produce lots/vials/doses where up to half of the mRNA molecules are fragmented or truncated. The safety and efficacy implications of this drop in quality were unknown…. Visible particles were also observed in many of the commercial batches and classified as ‘product-related impurities.” Perseus MHRA Main Report - April 2023.pdf

Serena Tinari, an investigative journalist wrote a peer reviewed article published in the BMJ, detailing the EMA data leak and what it revealed…

“The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19. None offered any specifics. The MHRA, the UK’s medicines regulator, acknowledged the lack of a specified percentage RNA integrity, but declined to provide further detail. “The specification limit acceptance criteria are commercially confidential,” the agency said in an email. In subsequent correspondence, FDA, EMA, and Health Canada all stated that specific information related to the acceptability criteria is confidential.” The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability | The BMJ

Could you imagine this? Regulators won’t say what their acceptance criteria was,…. to insure our safety? What else do you need to know about how unsafe this product really was. For all we know, there was no acceptance criteria for this product to be approved, if they won’t share it with us.

Not only was there no testing done on this upscaled, altered product,… but was also found to have impurities and significant quality issues (integrity) that can possibly lead to serious consequences. We don’t know the extent of the danger because this product was never tested,… much less the impurities or mRNA fragments being looked at. Half the vaccines synthetic mRNA might code for completely unknown proteins,… In fact, the EMA said as much in an Assessment report a year later…

“The following uncertainties are considered to be of importance for the benefit-risk assessment: • Truncated and modified RNA are present as impurities. Considering the low dose…. the impurities are not considered a safety issue…. However, when present in the cell there is a possibility that aberrant proteins will be expressed with possibilities for unwanted immunological events.” EMA Assessment Report on Pfizer’s Comirnaty (Feb. 2021)

Not a safety issue, knowing full well half the mRNA in these vaccines might code for aberrant proteins. This,… in addition to intact strands creating the intended highly toxic spike proteins. And I won’t even bother to go into the DNA contaminants found in batches and their implications. Needless to say, this is a very dangerous product to our health and wellbeing.

How they continue to say “Safe and Effective” just boggles the mind, when there are 9 pages of assorted adverse events related to these shots. This from Pfizer’s own confidential report beginning on page 30.

5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of BNT162b2 (May 2021)

This could be nightmare we might never wake up from, with governments throwing out the rule book, bypassing all safety procedures, not giving informed consent, and putting everyone's lives in jeopardy. Is this what we can expect from now on? Cause I don't see anyone raising any red flags.

Stay safe and be well….